How does tagging impact the review process of documents?

Tagging significantly enhances the review process of documents by allowing for differentiation between confidential and non-confidential documents. This distinction is crucial in various contexts, especially in legal, corporate, or sensitive information environments, as it helps reviewers easily identify which documents require more stringent handling or special consideration due to their sensitivity.

By effectively categorizing documents, tagging enables legal teams, compliance officers, or any review panel to prioritize their work. They can focus on confidential materials that may have significant legal implications or require further scrutiny, while also allowing the more straightforward handling of non-confidential documents. This organized approach contributes not only to more efficient reviews but also to maintaining regulatory compliance and protecting sensitive information.

The other choices do not accurately reflect the function of tagging in relation to document review. Automatic archiving typically involves a system setting rather than a tagging feature. Quick access to all documents is a potential benefit of a well-organized system, but it isn't a direct consequence of tagging; it's more about overall system performance. Lastly, tagging doesn't prevent the tagging of any document type; rather, it facilitates the process by allowing the assignment of relevant tags to various documents for better categorization.