Which of the following best describes the review process in Relativity?

The review process in Relativity is best described as dynamic and involves multiple reviewers. This characteristic is integral to the system, as documents are often subjected to various levels of scrutiny by different individuals, depending on the complexity and requirements of the case. The collaborative nature of the review process allows teams to engage with documents in real-time, providing feedback, tagging, and making annotations as necessary. This dynamic approach fosters an environment where review criteria can evolve based on ongoing findings and discussions among the reviewers, enhancing the overall quality and efficiency of the review.

In contrast, a linear and unchangeable process would imply a rigid structure where documents could only be reviewed in a predetermined sequence without the flexibility to adapt to new information or insights, which is not the case in Relativity. Similarly, a focus solely on document creation overlooks the critical importance of the review stage in the broader context of e-discovery, where assessing and analyzing documents is essential. Additionally, the notion that the review process eliminates the need for user input disregards the collaborative effort essential to ensuring that the review outcomes are detailed and accurate. User engagement and input are vital for effective reviews in Relativity.